One Decision Changed Everything | CJP Protest Explained | Special Episode 2026

Saade Aala Radio

The episode examines the recent CJP student protests and the heavy-handed response from the Delhi Police. The speakers critique the use of f

Key takeaways

• The Delhi Police are accused of using physical force and brutality against students during CJP demonstrations.
• Speakers highlight a lack of accountability among political leaders when managing large-scale protests.

Main topics

• CJP Student Protests
• Police Brutality

Notable quotes

In Indian politics, there is no such thing as incompetence.

Conclusion

The episode provides a scathing critique of state-led suppression of s

Transcript preview

Speaker 2 (0:21) He had a clash with the Delhi Police. You know what? They Let's go, Sir. Let's go. Speaker 3 (0:24) are talking in the media language. You know what a clash is? You came, I got beaten, you got beaten, and then they got beaten. One side is a bag, the other side is a thug. They don't call it a clash. They say it's a fight. They are not in a clash. It's basically a big fight. It's not Speaker 1 (0:37) a Speaker 3 (0:37) clash. They Speaker 2 (0:38) didn't do anything. Speaker 3 (0:39) They Speaker 1 (0:39) did. They were sitting and talking. They were talking. Speaker 3 (0:43) It's not Speaker 1 (0:43) a Speaker 3 (0:43) clash. It's basically the same language. Sikh riots 1984. Speaker 3 (1:02) I Speaker 1 (1:02) think all students should go there. Go there and meet them. We also go there. I saw a Speaker 3 (1:08) video of him. He was roaming around. Many boys didn't understand that he was beating them. Speaker 2 (1:16) They Speaker 3 (1:16) were beating them. Speaker 2 (1:17) I think the violent class or political party that organizes them, they should be with them wherever they are. Speaker 2 (1:29) The big action that is taking place in the police force, for example, Speaker 3 (1:33) if Speaker 2 (1:33) you take Speaker 3 (1:33) the Speaker 2 (1:33) march, we will take Speaker 3 (1:35) the Speaker 2 (1:35) example of the party that has a political party in Speaker 1 (1:39) the party. They Speaker 2 (1:39) have a political party in power and another party is protesting. They will march Speaker 1 (1:43) to Speaker 2 (1:43) the party. So they know in actuality that we are not Speaker 1 (1:47) going to the Speaker 2 (1:47) party in actuality. We Speaker 1 (1:48) have Speaker 2 (1:48) to Speaker 1 (1:49) give Speaker 2 (1:49) symbolism. Their senior officer comes first, or DSP, or whatever duty they have. He said, tell us how much strength you have, we will Speaker 3 (1:59) call the Speaker 2 (1:59) police force. And you tell us how much force you have to Speaker 3 (2:03) use. Speaker 2 (2:03) But if you don't listen to us, we will use our force. And if it is not enough, then tell us, we have 500 people, 200 people, 1000 people. So we will do some barricading with them. You can do something with this amount. Speaker 2 (2:19) You can do that, but you have to wind up your Speaker 1 (2:22) own. Speaker 2 (2:22) This is mad fixing, sir. I mean, if you don't Speaker 3 (2:26) want Speaker 2 (2:26) to Speaker 3 (2:26) say Speaker 2 (2:26) it on Speaker 3 (2:27) camera, Speaker 2 (2:27) then don't say it. All politicians know Speaker 3 (2:29) this. Speaker 2 (2:30) All politicians know this, and all people know this. If someone Speaker 3 (2:33) comes to Speaker 2 (2:33) protest, then it's not him, it's someone else. People don't even know Punjab. So, it happens that sometimes it happens twice, sometimes thrice, sometimes even six times. Some people are very enthusiastic. Some youths come to Speaker 1 (2:45) our Speaker 2 (2:45) Pradhan to get tickets. Some of them have done Speaker 1 (2:49) a little Speaker 2 (2:49) class, some have done more. But basically, they are there, they have to do it. They don't have to go in actual. Speaker 2 (2:58) What happened yesterday, students mostly protested against it. The states that do this, like Punjab, North Eastern states, they are very good at it. They say Pakistan is a terrorist. Speaker 2 (3:21) The Speaker 1 (3:22) students who are in Delhi Speaker 2 (3:22) are not going to Speaker 1 (3:23) the Speaker 2 (3:23) state. They are marching to the state. They are not students, they are Speaker 1 (3:27) coming from all Speaker 2 (3:27) over the Speaker 1 (3:28) country. Speaker 2 (3:28) They are Speaker 1 (3:29) still Speaker 2 (3:29) taking time to give a narrative. How can they be defamed? No, Speaker 1 (3:35) no, they Speaker 2 (3:35) are saying it from Speaker 1 (3:35) Pakistan. Speaker 2 (3:38) Deepak has been following Pakistan since Speaker 1 (3:41) the beginning. Speaker 2 (3:41) He Speaker 1 (3:41) is Speaker 2 (3:41) a member Speaker 1 (3:41) of the Speaker 2 (3:41) Aam Aadmi Party. He works for Aam Aadmi. Whoever gives arguments about this, why don't they ask why the papers are leaked? They think it's okay for terrorists to say that the papers should not Speaker 1 (3:57) be Speaker 2 (3:57) leaked. Then you think that the education system of Speaker 1 (4:01) the country is a bad thing for terrorists? Speaker 2 (4:01) It's their Speaker 3 (4:02) mistake Speaker 1 (4:04) to leak Speaker 3 (4:04) the papers. Speaker 1 (4:07) I don't Speaker 3 (4:07) think Speaker 1 (4:07) so. I don't think so. Speaker 2 (4:24) Because in actual parliament, they can't vote. The force is also a duty. In actual parliament, it was clear even Speaker 3 (4:29) before the farmer protest. As long as PM doesn't come to the house, we don't care. We can sit wherever we want. It was the same. And no matter what, they could reach the parliament. I thought Speaker 1 (4:41) I was just a trucker, I would sit. They are sitting in the car and they start cutting. They are Speaker 3 (4:47) waiting for the Speaker 1 (4:49) police Speaker 3 (4:49) to come. They say turn around and turn around. But I don't know what is happening. Delhi police is here, they are here. They don't have permission. They are sending Speaker 2 (4:58) the Speaker 3 (4:58) civil guard. Look, they are... They don't Speaker 1 (5:02) even Speaker 3 (5:02) have police officers. Speaker 1 (5:13) They are basically goons. They Speaker 3 (5:14) are Speaker 2 (5:14) asking us who Speaker 1 (5:18) we Speaker 2 (5:18) are. The police don't even give us a name plate. They just say we fell in Speaker 1 (5:27) the Speaker 2 (5:27) river. This happens. But in civil dress, this has happened Speaker 1 (5:32) during the Speaker 2 (5:32) farmer protest. They were Speaker 3 (5:34) also Speaker 2 (5:34) in civil dress. When Muslims were protesting, Speaker 3 (5:38) they didn't drive Speaker 2 (5:39) their car. They don't know who drove their car. Yes, they don't know. It's unknown. So, they were being beaten. Because of this, the Jainist protest, people were not able to use their phones. So, videos were circulated Speaker 3 (5:54) a Speaker 2 (5:54) lot. Speaker 3 (5:55) They were Speaker 2 (5:56) doing live. Speaker 2 (5:58) They said it was not Speaker 3 (5:59) working on Speaker 2 (5:59) the internet, but basically they made videos. So, the videos have been circulating a lot. But the first time people who do it, they Speaker 3 (6:11) say Speaker 2 (6:11) that it cannot be done, they are lying. When someone does Speaker 3 (6:15) a Speaker 2 (6:15) wrong thing, they say that it cannot Speaker 3 (6:17) be Speaker 2 (6:17) done, they do Speaker 3 (6:18) not do Speaker 2 (6:18) it. So, this thing is open to many people, I have seen it myself. Speaker 2 (6:24) Some people who know us, they want our support. They say, you don't read laws, you have to eat, eat, eat. They want a healthy conversation. They also say, they don't Speaker 3 (6:37) lie Speaker 2 (6:37) 100%. They say, the police do this. The police are doing this. Yes, you will know Speaker 3 (6:43) it slowly. Now, before they Speaker 2 (6:45) start Speaker 3 (6:45) talking about Speaker 2 (6:46) it, Speaker 3 (6:46) they are talking about some videos. The police are making the girls wrong. Yes. Speaker 2 (6:50) One girl was slapped Speaker 1 (6:51) and the other was standing. Speaker 2 (7:18) Because you haven't seen the brutality of the police. And you don't even know who they are. They have police uniforms and they have nameplates. Some government is trying No, no, I'm also... Speaker 1 (7:27) to Speaker 2 (7:27) fool us. What are you Speaker 3 (7:30) talking Speaker 2 (7:30) about Speaker 3 (7:30) accountability? The government is not doing anything wrong. The government is not doing anything wrong to the police. What are you talking about? I mean, whatever you want. I'm Speaker 2 (7:36) talking about the people who are saying... I think people should be... You have given a full statement. Speaker 1 (7:43) No, Speaker 2 (7:44) no, you should criticize the centre for everything. They protested and stopped them. They should be punished. It's not possible. You should exaggerate and tell the truth. If Speaker 3 (7:53) we Speaker 1 (7:54) think that political Speaker 3 (7:54) protestors are doing Congress Party, then we don't believe them. This is what the common people are doing. They don't know why they are protesting. Speaker 1 (8:00) No, no, Congress will support us, why not? Speaker 2 (8:03) They say you should exaggerate, but the police don't Speaker 3 (8:08) do Speaker 2 (8:08) this much brutality. Who Speaker 3 (8:10) are Speaker 2 (8:10) they to you? I talk to people who have conversations. They say, there's a guy fighting with Speaker 1 (8:17) you, Speaker 2 (8:17) go out. No, no, no. But Speaker 1 (8:20) if the opposition party is protesting against us, then we... The opposition party should be the one to protest. The Speaker 3 (8:28) opposition party is protesting Speaker 1 (8:29) against Speaker 3 (8:29) your people. We Speaker 1 (8:31) don't know Speaker 3 (8:31) what to do. Congress Speaker 1 (8:35) has also protested. I'm not Speaker 2 (8:38) talking Speaker 1 (8:38) about Punjab. The central congress Speaker 2 (8:41) has also Speaker 1 (8:41) protested. Speaker 2 (8:47) So, Speaker 1 (8:47) we will sit Speaker 2 (8:48) with Speaker 1 (8:48) Rahul Gandhi and have a congress. Obviously, if a government is formed, then the entire population should behave as an opposition. At Speaker 3 (8:58) least the opposition should behave. I don't Speaker 2 (9:02) think the opposition will do anything. They have not done anything. What can the opposition do? They will do anything. They will try Speaker 1 (9:09) to run the Speaker 2 (9:09) narrative. You see, Pakadi is so strong. You can't Speaker 1 (9:16) get Speaker 2 (9:16) any kind of blame from Speaker 1 (9:17) them Speaker 2 (9:17) because they give Speaker 1 (9:17) you Speaker 2 (9:17) a paper and they say that the paper is leaking. So you just change your minister. Speaker 3 (9:22) The Speaker 2 (9:23) minister doesn't say that you should Speaker 1 (9:24) bring the Speaker 2 (9:24) minister of Congress. You can change that. If there was a rail accident, then the accountability of Speaker 1 (9:31) the person would Speaker 2 (9:31) change. If people died, then they would Speaker 1 (9:34) change. Speaker 2 (9:34) Now students died in this. They died because of suicide. Their whole life is ruined. What is Speaker 1 (9:41) the Speaker 2 (9:41) point of doing investigation and re-investigating? I Speaker 3 (9:45) have Speaker 2 (9:46) explained this Speaker 3 (9:47) concept to Speaker 2 (9:50) you twice already. Speaker 3 (9:50) In Indian politics, there is no such thing as competency. In any field, if you are incompetent, if you are incompetent Speaker 1 (9:59) as Speaker 3 (9:59) a husband, then you will Speaker 1 (10:01) be Speaker 3 (10:01) fired. If you are incompetent in your job, then you will be fired. In Indian politics, there is only one thing, where there is no such thing as incompetence. Speaker 3 (10:10) And the fact that BJP used to give him a punch in the past, it was not a problem for you. Now you have basically, I think you have understood the wrong thing. If they don't cut him, then he will be in trouble. If they don't cut him, then it will be like this. Basically, there Speaker 1 (10:23) is an ego problem in Speaker 3 (10:24) the people of India. Speaker 1 (10:24) There is Speaker 3 (10:25) a Speaker 1 (10:25) huge ego problem. Their ego is too big. It has come to them because they have been in the government for Speaker 2 (10:31) 15 years. Speaker 1 (10:31) You know everything, we will control everything. Speaker 1 (10:35) So, it's an ego problem. There is no problem in cutting. Darminder Pradhan has nothing. He has Speaker 3 (10:41) cut Speaker 1 (10:41) the CM. Darminder Pradhan is not a worthy candidate. He will get a lot of votes in his house. He will go to the Hindu board. Darminder Pradhan means nothing. Speaker 3 (10:52) People Speaker 1 (10:53) don't Speaker 3 (10:53) even know the name of Speaker 1 (10:53) Darminder Pradhan. They don't even Speaker 2 (10:56) know Speaker 1 (10:56) that he is the Education Minister. They will cut him. There is no problem. But the ego of the BJP politicians is very big. Have you seen the same thing? The same thing that Speaker 3 (11:15) the Speaker 1 (11:15) wrestler sat on the ground. Yes, Speaker 3 (11:17) yes, yes. Speaker 1 (11:17) You don't Speaker 3 (11:18) believe me. I'll show you. Speaker 1 (11:19) What's his name? Brij Bhushana. Brij Bhushana. Everyone knows he's a goon. Everyone knows he's a two-number. He was making Speaker 2 (11:26) a video of Speaker 1 (11:26) a car, and he was talking about Land Cruiser, a car worth 25 billion, a guy had made Speaker 2 (11:34) a Speaker 1 (11:34) reel about it. He said that he knows, the public knows about the McRapta, the government knows about the McRapta, but the villagers Speaker 2 (11:41) know nothing. They Speaker 1 (11:42) can cut it off, but they can't Speaker 2 (11:44) cut it off. Speaker 2 (11:47) They saw that the farmer protest is getting bigger, so they decided to take it back. But why did they delay it for a year? They Speaker 3 (11:54) said Speaker 2 (11:54) they will do it. They Speaker 3 (11:56) will remove the farmer protest. There Speaker 2 (11:58) is Speaker 1 (11:59) no problem with Speaker 2 (11:59) the farmer protest. They are the main. There Speaker 1 (12:02) is no Speaker 2 (12:02) problem. The farmer protest Speaker 1 (12:04) was a big deal. It was a big deal. It was a big deal on a global scale. They are Speaker 2 (12:09) facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They Speaker 3 (12:14) are facing the same problem. Speaker 2 (12:14) They are Speaker 3 (12:15) facing the Speaker 2 (12:15) same Speaker 3 (12:15) problem. They are facing the same Speaker 2 (12:15) problem. They Speaker 3 (12:15) are facing the Speaker 2 (12:15) same problem. They Speaker 3 (12:16) are facing Speaker 2 (12:16) the same Speaker 3 (12:16) problem. Speaker 2 (12:16) They Speaker 3 (12:16) Because are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem. They are facing the same problem Speaker 2 (12:17) obviously, people have their own personal brand. They have their own personal branding. They have learned Speaker 3 (12:25) from Speaker 2 (12:25) Yogi Dittar. Yes, I Speaker 3 (12:27) have Speaker 2 (12:27) been doing Speaker 3 (12:27) this for Speaker 2 (12:27) 15 years. So now, the problem they are facing is the same as the one of UPG. Because 10 years of Yogi Dittar have passed. Speaker 1 (12:37) They Speaker 2 (12:37) don't Speaker 1 (12:38) let us go Speaker 2 (12:38) to Speaker 1 (12:38) 15 Speaker 2 (12:38) years of Yogi Dittar. Because we don't have a proper leader. So now... They can't bring him. They can't bring him. Because he is the main centric face Speaker 1 (12:47) of Hindu politics. Speaker 2 (12:48) He has told us that this is how it is. But Speaker 1 (12:51) we say that the people who are using the common sense have no answer to this. One team member Speaker 3 (12:57) said that these are the roots Speaker 1 (12:58) of Speaker 3 (12:58) RSS. Listen to me, RSS has only one training, they don't teach you to hit a stone. But they are doing it. Speaker 1 (13:06) Who is the witness in Speaker 2 (13:08) this case? Speaker 1 (13:08) There should Speaker 2 (13:08) be Speaker 1 (13:08) no recordization. That's why you called us. Speaker 2 (13:12) If I ask the police, who will answer? The police will answer. It's not their problem. Speaker 1 (13:16) No problem. We will do it. The police Speaker 2 (13:18) brought them. They have helmets too. Speaker 1 (13:20) They have helmets Speaker 2 (13:22) too. Speaker 1 (13:23) They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They Speaker 3 (13:25) have helmets too. Speaker 1 (13:25) They Speaker 3 (13:25) have helmets too. Speaker 1 (13:26) They Speaker 3 (13:26) have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They Speaker 1 (13:26) have helmets too. Speaker 3 (13:26) They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They Speaker 1 (13:26) have Speaker 3 (13:26) helmets too. They Speaker 1 (13:26) have Speaker 3 (13:26) helmets Speaker 1 (13:26) too. Speaker 3 (13:26) They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They have helmets too. They Speaker 1 (13:29) have helmets Speaker 3 (13:38) I'm a goonda. No, no, your goonda is not at Speaker 1 (13:43) fault. Speaker 3 (13:46) Just because the police are beating you, how Speaker 1 (13:48) can they beat Speaker 3 (13:48) you? If you beat them, they will beat you too. Even if they are a goon. Now, you are beating the police in front of them. And you are drinking tea with the police. You are drinking tea with the police in the real world. This means that the police have met them. They have brought the police to them. They have brought the police to them. I Speaker 1 (14:01) am not saying that they have brought them. The police will bring them. I am not saying that I will Speaker 3 (14:06) ask Speaker 1 (14:06) the police who beat them. The police have not answered yet. It is his birthday. Who is he? Where is he? Do your work. Yes, he is still saying that. He is still saying Speaker 3 (14:15) that. He is still saying that. He is Speaker 1 (14:16) still Speaker 3 (14:16) saying that. He Speaker 1 (14:17) is Speaker 3 (14:17) still Speaker 1 (14:17) saying Speaker 3 (14:17) that. Speaker 1 (14:17) He Speaker 3 (14:18) is Speaker 1 (14:18) still saying that. Speaker 3 (14:18) He is still saying that. He is still saying that. Speaker 1 (14:20) He is still saying that. Speaker 3 (14:20) He is still saying that. He is still saying that. Speaker 1 (14:21) He Speaker 2 (14:21) is still saying that. Speaker 1 (14:22) He is still saying Speaker 3 (14:22) that. He is still saying that. He Speaker 1 (14:22) is Speaker 3 (14:22) still Speaker 1 (14:22) saying that. Speaker 3 (14:23) He is still saying that. He is still saying that. Speaker 1 (14:23) He is still saying that. He is still saying that. He is still saying that. He is still saying that. He is still saying that. He is still saying that. He is still saying that. He Speaker 3 (14:27) is still saying that. He is still saying that. Speaker 1 (14:27) He Speaker 3 (14:27) is still saying that. Speaker 1 (14:27) He Speaker 3 (14:27) is still saying that. Speaker 1 (14:27) He Speaker 3 (14:28) is still saying Speaker 1 (14:28) that. He Speaker 3 (14:28) is still Speaker 1 (14:28) saying that. Speaker 3 (14:28) He Speaker 1 (14:28) is still Speaker 3 (14:28) saying that. Speaker 1 (14:28) He Speaker 3 (14:28) is still saying that. Speaker 1 (14:28) He Speaker 3 (14:28) is still saying that. He is still saying that. He is still saying that. He is still Speaker 2 (14:31) saying Speaker 1 (14:31) that. Speaker 2 (14:41) He is still saying that. The video that the girls were talking about was actually a video. He was talking to Speaker 3 (14:48) his father and Speaker 2 (14:48) then he said something Speaker 3 (14:49) to Speaker 2 (14:49) his Speaker 3 (14:49) father Speaker 2 (14:49) and then he took Speaker 3 (14:50) him. Speaker 2 (14:50) Then he got Speaker 3 (14:51) into a Speaker 2 (14:51) fight and then he Speaker 3 (14:53) took Speaker 2 (14:53) him. He took his father and said that father is doing civil party marathons and is arguing with protesters. When he saw that he was Speaker 1 (15:01) not a Speaker 2 (15:01) girl. He said that the girl was behind him and that there was Speaker 1 (15:05) no Speaker 2 (15:05) one Speaker 1 (15:05) to Speaker 2 (15:05) talk to. Then he took him and said that he will not take him. I noticed something. Speaker 1 (15:10) I noticed something Speaker 3 (15:11) in Speaker 1 (15:11) the protest in Delhi. Speaker 3 (15:16) The old man who is talking about Modi's rights, he has a pattern. He has a bald head. He has a bald head and a shiny head. Like a bald head. Like a bald head. Speaker 1 (15:28) BJP voters are the same. Yes, Speaker 3 (15:31) yes, yes. He Speaker 2 (15:31) is Speaker 3 (15:31) talking about Speaker 1 (15:32) it. Speaker 3 (15:32) All the old people have the same similarity. The old man who votes for BJP, he has a bald head. And I'm all shiny. And Speaker 1 (15:38) everyone is the same, right? Hindu-national. What did America say? They said, poor people have come back. It's wrong to Speaker 2 (15:44) do that. Now they say, what are you? I have read the comments sometimes. Some people are paid, but all the posts are the same. Some are 60-70 % Speaker 3 (15:57) paid, the rest are Speaker 2 (15:58) 40%. Speaker 3 (15:59) And Speaker 1 (15:59) those who are actually defending, they say such stupid Speaker 2 (16:02) things. They... I don't understand why they are showing their helplessness. If a nation relies on Speaker 1 (16:15) the government, Speaker 2 (16:15) they do it because they are not jungle kings. The system is made for your protection. You will never be helpless. If anything happens to Speaker 3 (16:24) you, Speaker 2 (16:24) you will Speaker 3 (16:25) be Speaker 2 (16:25) held Speaker 3 (16:26) accountable in Speaker 2 (16:26) court. Speaker 2 (16:29) They are not Speaker 3 (16:29) just Speaker 2 (16:29) being helpless, they are saying that you are right and they are beating you up. I agree that the guy who was beaten up, who is being shown in 23-24 year old videos, is a criminal. Then you allow him to beat you up on the road? No. Then you beat him up and beat him up again? No. Then another guy says that he was beaten up after he was shot by a 2200mph officer. Speaker 3 (16:58) This is the Speaker 2 (16:59) kind of comments Speaker 1 (17:00) they are getting. I think it's a country Speaker 2 (17:02) of Speaker 1 (17:02) illiterate people. Illiterate, illiterate, stupid people. No, no, no, it's not Speaker 3 (17:07) stupid Speaker 1 (17:07) people. Speaker 3 (17:08) It's not Speaker 1 (17:08) stupid people. It's Speaker 2 (17:10) not Speaker 1 (17:10) stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not Speaker 2 (17:12) stupid Speaker 1 (17:12) people. It's not Speaker 2 (17:12) stupid people. Speaker 1 (17:13) It's not stupid people. Speaker 2 (17:13) It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not Speaker 3 (17:18) stupid Speaker 2 (17:18) people. It's Speaker 3 (17:19) not Speaker 2 (17:19) stupid Speaker 3 (17:20) people. Speaker 2 (17:20) It's not stupid people. Speaker 3 (17:21) It's not stupid people. It's Speaker 2 (17:24) not Speaker 3 (17:24) stupid people. It's Speaker 1 (17:26) not Speaker 3 (17:26) stupid people. It's not Speaker 1 (17:27) stupid Speaker 3 (17:27) people. It's Speaker 1 (17:29) not Speaker 3 (17:29) stupid people. He Speaker 1 (17:30) It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not Speaker 3 (17:30) stupid Speaker 1 (17:30) is Speaker 3 (17:30) justifying Speaker 1 (17:31) people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. It's not stupid people. Speaker 3 (17:31) It's Speaker 1 (17:31) not it. Speaker 3 (17:31) I called him in the morning. He is exploring Twitter and watching videos. He is justifying it. If I go against the country, it will be like this. If I go against the international people, it will be like Speaker 2 (17:39) this. I am helpless there. When something happened to your family, how will you prove it? There is a Speaker 3 (17:48) fat journalist who was drinking water. He said, it is not water, it is chicken soup. He said, I will play something on the mic. I will play something on the mic. Because your voice will Speaker 2 (18:02) be better. Because your Speaker 3 (18:03) face is not getting better. Speaker 2 (18:06) He is taking Speaker 3 (18:08) time in the Speaker 2 (18:08) bathroom. What Speaker 3 (18:10) is there Speaker 2 (18:10) to eat Speaker 1 (18:11) in Speaker 2 (18:11) the bathroom? Your mother is the one who took the time. People are so illiterate. You can't lie to them. You are Speaker 3 (18:22) not going to make Speaker 2 (18:22) a fool Speaker 1 (18:25) of yourself. Speaker 2 (18:25) You will Speaker 1 (18:26) get a notice in 10 Speaker 2 (18:26) minutes. You are lying. Reporters don't know this. Speaker 2 (18:36) If you go Speaker 1 (18:37) to Speaker 2 (18:37) the bathroom and eat and do the dishes, then you will be able to do it for 2 years. Basically, Speaker 1 (18:44) this is not a reporter. I called the BJP troll army in the office. I asked Speaker 2 (18:48) them Speaker 1 (18:48) who are these guys. Who are they? Who are they? Who Speaker 2 (18:52) are they? Speaker 1 (18:52) Who are Speaker 2 (18:53) they? Speaker 1 (18:53) Who Speaker 2 (18:53) are they? Who are they? Who are they? Speaker 1 (18:54) Who Speaker 2 (18:54) are they? Speaker 1 (18:54) Who Speaker 3 (18:54) are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Speaker 1 (18:57) Who Speaker 3 (18:57) are they? Speaker 1 (18:57) Who Speaker 3 (18:57) are they? Speaker 1 (18:57) Who Speaker 3 (18:57) are they? Who are they? Who are they? Speaker 1 (18:57) Who are Speaker 2 (18:57) they? Speaker 1 (18:58) Who Speaker 2 (18:58) are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Speaker 1 (18:58) Who Speaker 2 (18:58) are Speaker 1 (18:58) they? Speaker 2 (18:58) Who Speaker 1 (18:58) are they? Who are they? I was Speaker 3 (19:04) a Speaker 1 (19:04) media person, so I said, forget Speaker 3 (19:06) about Speaker 1 (19:06) your mic, it's a mess. I was Speaker 3 (19:08) understanding a historical pattern. The one who came from Sonobang to the stage was Congress. Speaker 3 (19:20) Ramdev didn't Speaker 1 (19:21) want to get beaten up. No, I'm saying that Speaker 3 (19:22) Ramdev didn't Speaker 1 (19:24) have any Speaker 3 (19:24) intention. At that time, the scammers of Congress were doing it. So Ramdev was sitting with the right intention. The Congress didn't want to do it. They were beating him up. They were Speaker 1 (19:31) throwing him Speaker 3 (19:31) in the hospital. The BJP didn't want Speaker 1 (19:33) to Speaker 3 (19:33) do it. They are going to lose this Speaker 1 (19:34) much. Bad! Speaker 2 (19:36) See, he says... He's Speaker 1 (19:37) got the Speaker 2 (19:37) last kill. He says, Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi are sitting and drinking juice. They shouldn't have done it. They were beating him up. He was so angry that he said, I'm not going to sit here. I'm Speaker 1 (19:48) not going to sit Speaker 2 (19:50) here. He was Speaker 1 (19:50) so angry that he didn't say anything. He sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so Speaker 2 (19:57) angry Speaker 1 (19:57) that Speaker 2 (19:57) he sat Speaker 1 (19:57) in Speaker 2 (19:58) his sister's Speaker 1 (19:58) lap. He was Speaker 2 (19:58) so Speaker 1 (19:58) angry that Speaker 2 (19:59) he sat Speaker 1 (19:59) in his Speaker 2 (19:59) sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. He was so angry that he sat in his sister's lap. Speaker 3 (20:03) He was so Speaker 2 (20:03) angry that Not neat note paper, Speaker 3 (20:04) he sat Speaker 2 (20:04) in Speaker 3 (20:04) his Speaker 2 (20:04) sister's lap Speaker