Nijam lo nijam enta? Part2

Ramuism

The episode features a philosophical discussion regarding the nature of truth and political integrity in Andhra Pradesh. The speaker explore

Key takeaways

• The speaker admires JGM's simplicity and directness but strongly opposes his film ticket policies.
• Discussion touches upon CBI investigations and allegations involving property disputes and domestic affairs.

Main topics

• Political character analysis
• Truth vs. falsehood in society

Notable quotes

Truth is a very powerful force.

Conclusion

The episode serves as a meditative look at the role of transparency an

Transcript preview

Speaker 2 (0:00) . Speaker 2 (0:45) I also don't want to get into that. Speaker 2 (0:50) 1 నిస్యం నేన్ కంస్నేడ్ చేస్తాండే యారుక్కా జగన్ కారుక్కి ఎట్టి పర్సేస్తున్నే దాన్ట్లో ఉంటాంకి అవకాశ్యున్నేద్దే అనేది నా న I don't know what kind of relationship they have. They are brothers. I don't know if they have any father-brother relationship. I didn't hear about it. It didn't come to me in the notice. And he is too big a man to be concerned about what Viveka will do in the election. so మీకు personal enmity ఉండే అందే importance ఇలేదు ఒకటే money is not the issue ఆయినీ ఇస్ నాట్ మోర్ పాప్లర్ దేన జగన as far as the ycp is concerned ycp party దేగర వివేకనాదరి పేర్ణినీ ఎప్పుడు ఇన్నలో ఇనాలుగ� Speaker 2 (1:52) now related thing is Speaker 2 (1:56) The motive is, suppose a daughter has an affair with a man. This is what the media is telling including the CBI. Speaker 1 (2:09) Everybody is agreed Speaker 2 (2:11) to Speaker 1 (2:12) that fact. Speaker 2 (2:13) Then in domestic disputes, if you are told that you will give this property to that girl or he will give it to her, Speaker 2 (2:24) 4-5 వార్టు వేకానందరే విద్దికానందరే విద్దికానందరే విద్దికానందరే విద్దికానందరే విద్దికానందరే విద్దికానందరే విద్దికానందరే I don't know if it is material evidence or circumstantial evidence. That's how it goes. So, in that case, Mr. Sharmila doesn't have the desire to be the motive. Because money is already her wealth. Speaker 2 (3:09) I don't know if the people who signed it know about it. Did they transfer it or write it as a property? No one knows about it. Even if I write it as a property, he can change it. Speaker 2 (3:46) I believe there is something in the law where you I don't know the exact legal aspect. But, అలా Speaker 1 (4:08) రాస్టారం ఏక్కడు నిర్ధారం అవల్లాదు కదా? అదే Speaker 2 (4:10) అందిందా. అదే అందిందా. అలా రాస్టారం ఏక్కడు నిర్ధారం అవల్లాదు కదా? అదే � . Speaker 1 (4:56) because Speaker 2 (4:57) every piece of thing, a new data which comes will keep on questioning the truth which has been established so far. Speaker 1 (5:06) మీర్కు మీరు మీ అప్రోచ్ చూసి గతర్లు పీర్ చేసింది ట్విట్టర్ లో మీ కమేంట్స్ కావర్చు మీర్ ఎవన్న పోలిటికలీ అఫిలీ� Speaker 2 (5:27) 1. I don't care about people. 2. I don't have any intention of serving anybody. Speaker 1 (5:33) 3. Speaker 2 (5:34) I don't want to have any responsibility leading to others. Speaker 1 (5:39) 4. Speaker 2 (5:42) I don't have any responsibility leading to others. Speaker 2 (5:58) I like Jagan as a person. I Speaker 1 (6:01) don't know about the vice-CPA Speaker 2 (6:02) party. I don't know what political parties will do. Why Speaker 1 (6:06) do you like Jagan? Because Speaker 2 (6:08) of the way he conducts himself and the way he talks. I like the simplicity. I like the way he doesn't go overboard like many other politicians, various parties. Speaker 1 (6:21) Simplicity as in how do you define it? I am just trying to understand what you mean. The way he Speaker 2 (6:24) is, అనాగా బట్లంగాని అదికాని, just looks like Speaker 1 (6:26) a guy. Speaker 2 (6:27) సమ్మారేస్టు క్షణేదేదేకే. Yeah, he doesn't go out of his way to లుక్కు గెటపేస్కునీ ఒక పర్టిక్రా డ్రస్ Speaker 2 (6:44) where big names are concerned. You know, Adhokte. Rindo the 2019 వారి స్పికిం వారి స్పికిం వారి స్పికిం వారి స్పికిం వారి స్పికిం వారి స్పికిం వారి స్పికిం వారి స్పికిం వారి స్పికిం వార I think he speaks sense and very to the point. The way he conducts himself, the way he answers in twitter, there will be certain qualities. Comparatively, I feel these people do much better than some other people. Speaker 1 (7:31) Young leaders and in a certain way. Yeah, yeah, correct. So Speaker 2 (7:34) like that. But at the same time, I was very much against Vice Jagan's decisions with regard to the film tickets. I was completely against it. I don't know why it's Jagan's policy. Whatever the government is taking, in the film industry aspect, it's not Speaker 1 (7:50) their Speaker 2 (7:50) business. So, liking someone is very different from liking everything about that person. You might like someone's answers in your dreams, but you might not agree with them. So, that's exactly the same thing that happens between any two human beings. Speaker 1 (8:23) I Speaker 2 (8:24) think main point