EMERGENCY UPDATE IN THE CHARLIE KIRK CASE! | Ep 357
Candace
Candace discusses new evidence in the Charlie Kirk case, emphasizing the importance of public collaboration. She reveals inconsistencies in witness testimonies and presents disturbing car photos showing shattered tempered glass, challenging official narratives. The episode highlights growing distrust in key figures and calls for transparency, with a focus on medical and forensic details. She thank
Key takeaways
- Shattered tempered glass found in car contradicts witness accounts.
- Witnesses' stories about the incident do not align with physical evidence.
- A medical bag and foil-like material in the car suggest possible medical intervention.
Transcript preview
All right you guys, thank you for your patience. Obviously we're a little early today because we were not supposed to be on air at all today. We don't really even have a show. I think you can sort of, you'll start to realize this is more of an open investigation and we're going to be asking you a lot of questions and asking for your contributions because we are not an expert at everything or really I guess any of the isolated things that we've been covering on this show. We have really been relying on people at home to help us figure out what happened to other timelines and pieces of information. Anyway, the reason I am on air is because I spoke with Baron Coleman yesterday evening and he convinced me that some evidence that he knew that I had positively needed to be shared before we went away for two weeks. They gave me his reasons as to why it was so significant and I rebutted about the timing. He obviously knew why we wanted to hold on to it, but I ultimately concluded that Baron Coleman was right. Now is the time to share it and to allow you guys to allow you guys to control it to control it and to control it and to try it and to before we go away. So welcome back to Candice. Okay, so I'll be great and big enough. Okay, so I think obviously if you guys have been on this journey with us, you understand what we have been doing here, the strategy that we have had. information that we have we have sat on and it's obvious we're we are playing chess here there are a lot of heavy players that are involved in Charlie Kirch assassination and we needed to also just be able to separate who were the good guys and who were the bad guys right just because Brian Harpold tells a lie just because Frank Turrick tells a lie does not mean that every single person at turning point USA is implicated right doesn't mean that any person at turning point USA is implicated right doesn't mean that any person at turning point USA is and needed to fully assess the character of a lot of individuals that were around Charlie, people who I couldn't believe would betray Charlie. I wanted to see who would lie, who would cover up, who would get behind and host commentators who were friends of Charlie Kirk's as they lied through their teeth to the public, tried to dissuade them from looking at certain evidence, telling them this is not possible. this is not true, but most importantly getting people who were intimately involved on that day to tell their stories over and over and over again. People like Frank Turrick is car ride, which is told differently than it is by Brian Harpold, their memory, very short ride, both of them telling stories that are not matching the shows that they are choosing to go on when they share it the terms that they are using, conspiracy theorists, demonic. We needed to see who these people are. Anyway, like I said, I won't believe of the point, but you get it. Recently, as you guys have seen, we have been at long last after debunking many elements of this case with various things that we have presented to the public exclusively convinced that Tyler Robinson did not murder Charlie Kirk. Was he an accessory to murder? Did he help out that day? Did he bury clothes at Dairy Queen? Certainly believe he did pick up clothes and bury them at Dairy Queen. I do not murder. I do not. I do not believe that. on top of Lozy Center firing a shot at Charlie Kirk's neck. I can say that unequivocally. And you saw that we began to reintroduce a theory that John Bray had been working on for a very long time regarding an explosive. He was convinced from the very beginning, John Bray, that Charlie's microphone was rigged beneath him and that it subsequently shattered. We obviously had those car picks had been working on that in the background, but what we did. not do was release all of the car photos. The purpose of that obviously is to see how audacious people will be. Well they lie. Well they lie and pretend that that is just I don't know blood drops. No that's just that's crazy. That's not, no that's not Charlie's microphone. That's not the road microphone that's something else. It's a pair of sunglasses. And lie they did. their teeth. So we're going to show you additional photos. So I want to say right at the top here obviously viewer discretion is very much advised. We are not going to obviously we've already seen the other photos. It's going to be very much like that. It's not like you're going to see Charlie's body here, but it will also show you some other details of the car that we can speak to you about and tell you what's missing and why it does not register. Well, none of this registers obviously. as right in our minds. What happened in this car does not match the stories that we have been told thus far. They're missing a big part. You don't just forget shattered glass, tempered glass from a microphone. How did that happen? Are we going to get a story about steel chest to go along with the steel neck? Are we to believe that someone did it with their bare hands? Why don't you try doing that? Why don't you try taking a road mic and breaking it in your bare hands? That's not possible? nobody's story told anything about even lifting Charlie's shirt, how that microphone could have broken, and we are now going to put the full pressure on them to do just that. So we're going to take you through a total of four additional photos, and then we will give you the close up. We can now say confidently that there is black, tempered, shatter, glass, all over the car, wear Charlie's chest, chest. region would have been according to the story that Frank Turrick and Brian Harple told. So here we go, let's go through these slowly and we will start asking questions. So you again see in this photo the Uber bag with the blood on it in the back seat, which I believe was most likely used to wipe hands afterwards, maybe perhaps getting out of the car. I think it's likely, given where Frank Turrick was sitting that that is him. But I do want to also point out this hanger to you. Another piece of information that we have had is that Charlie had his sports coat, his jacket, if you will, you'll remember that he gave an interview, which was quite mysterious in my opinion. He went to Salt Lake City and he gave an interview to restaurant technology, I think was the name of the company before he drove to Provo for this event. And so he had to. a jacket that he did not wear, obviously he was in a t-shirt that stayed in the car. I can tell you that that jacket was returned to his security and made it back to Erica's apartment with blood still on it. It was not collected into evidence. That is an important piece for me to share with you because the question that it leaves is, why was that personal effect, bloodied, returned pretty immediately back to Erica's apartment? in Arizona by the security. And again, the reason why I will say that that is an important detail is because the story that Frank Turrick tells us is he changed in part because he didn't want Erica to see him bloodied. So are we to believe that they did want to hand him a bloody jacket, hand her a bloody jacket of Charlie's? Like Frank's bloodied clothes would be more disturbing to her. We don't even know why they're bloody than Charlie's bloody clothes. that that's where I'm guessing that that hangar is from. Okay, let's go to the second photo and like I said we will get closer on this. We're gonna talk about that piece of what looks to me to be cardboard. It could be something else. People in the medical field might recognize it. This might have something to do with Brian's story about, you know, taking out, I don't think he said gauze, but packing the wound. We, like I said, we'll get a lot closer. That bag behind looks to me. like some sort of a medical bag maybe it's like binocular security bag something on the go in the comments you guys can write to us and this is like I said it's gonna be an open episode we want you to share with us anything that you recognize that you are seeing in that photos but we could not identify what that brand was in the background we've looked up different binocular brands and you know not saying it's anything to ferris we would like to identify what that item is that we can show you is, I don't know if you can see that clearly on your screen, but in the middle there is just full, shattered, tempered glass. There's no question mark, that is what is in the middle of that car. We will get close on that as well, so you can see it. John Bray was telling the truth. And many, many people, those who Charlie put on stage and who's corr were lying to you. They were lying to you. They were lying to you. They were calling this a conspiracy. It is not a conspiracy. It's not a conspiracy at all that there is tempered, shattered glass with white bits all over the center of this car and into the back seat. So the stories Frank and Brian Harpool have told to the public, for some reason, don't include this. We were told this. We were told only his neck was being addressed. He got right to work. Frank was praying in the back seat. They had about six minutes on the clock, weaving through traffic at 40, 60, 100 miles per an hour for a ride that Google Maps says is eight minutes away. And again, if you're able to hit those speeds, it means that you were not stuck in traffic. Why is this detail missing? And again, if you're able to hit those speeds, it means that you were not stuck in traffic. Why is this detail missing. That is just once you get closer you'll see I'm just wondering what's under that mat it looks to me like something that's foil Potentially and when we get super close on it you'll be able to see the color of it and I'm again My guess there is that that's gonna be something that was in the medical bag But someone in the comments will recognize it. Let's get into these closer images. Okay. So this particular piece at first glance. the Uber bag but then I sort of also thought that it looks to me like it was a lot thicker and I'm referring to what looks like a piece of cardboard there it's also separate from the bag entirely separate from the rest of the bag and when we look at the bag it doesn't look like it was ripped into small bits the whole bags seem to be together and this it just stood out to me because it almost looked like it reminded me just visually what I feel like I'm looking at is like when you burn the edges of a cardboard I was sort of referencing that when I was a kid and we didn't have lighters I used to just like grab a box and and go to the gas stove and light that on fire and then light the candle and blow it out and that just is what it sort of looks like to me. Our team also posited that maybe it's just looks that way because it could just be heavy blood or by the way it could be something that people in the medical community will recognize. You know that's a standard paper brown color so to speak cardboard color so to speak So it it obviously has blood on it It was just it looks thicker to me the way that it's sitting Just looks thicker to me, but of course I could be wrong We're just allowing you guys to weigh in on that like what that could be why that would be separated from the bag Which while it is damaged the two bags the Uber bags are together and not that drench they look more like again like somebody sort of wiped their hands very quickly because they didn't have paper towels not really having that drenching and none of the ends of the paper bag look like that so that's a point of curiosity for us if we can get to that bag do we have the close-up of the bag yeah that's as I think about as close as we can get to that black bag in the back there and like I said yeah someone in the comment said shirt maybe that's funny that's funny literally just said that to us in our marketing department said that looks like a shirt that's the first thing he said but I'm wondering what a shirt that's I mean it's interesting but is that doesn't look necessarily like a white shirt again all open source investigation want to share it with you so everybody is able to have this at home and if anybody recognizes that in the back and ash I'm sure you're monitoring the comments if we see anything nobody saying why is it burnt I don't know if it is burnt my eyes just looking at it would describe that thicker and measure, so to speak, but it could also be something that is totally benign and looks that way for some specific reason that makes sense. It's burnt. Oh, someone is saying that the back that could be a taser. I thought that too. I tried to look up taser brands because that would be something that I thought for a second because I did remember that Rick Cutler had something on his back when he was running in there. I thought it would make sense that he would just throw it off so that he could sit more properly. but it didn't match what Rick Cutler had on him. So interesting, people in the comments, Skyler is saying, is that it could be a pulse force, what'd you say, for 2002? Okay, I like that. We did think it could be more medical standard that somebody has on them. I'd like to identify the brand. We've got every country in the world watching this. Somebody is going to recognize the specific brand so we can go check off and just sort to sort to sort to sort through. everything that we're seeing. That was our minds that we were going taser, binocular, something security that someone had on them. So I like all of these things. Thank you guys so much. And okay, let's get to, did they burn the shirt? Interesting, I'm just reading your comments out loud. I don't know if a burnt shirt would look like that because doesn't that seem quite stiff that piece? I don't know. The answer